Showing posts with label scientism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scientism. Show all posts

Monday, April 27, 2026

Sources of Knowledge - How we know what we know! (Basics of Epistemology-1)

 There are three main sources of knowledge humans use to arrive at truth - 1) Five senses, 2) Intellect and 3) Reliable Testimony:


1. The Five Senses (Experience & Observation) 


This is Empirical Knowledge gained through the senses—what we see, hear, measure, and test.

  • It is the foundation of modern science (Empiricism).
  • Built on observation, experimentation, and repeatability.

Example: You know fire burns because you observe heat and tissue damage; in medicine, MRI findings guide diagnosis because they’re empirically verifiable.


Strengths:

Highly reliable for the physical world; testable and objective.


Limitations:

Restricted to what can be observed/measured; cannot directly answer moral, metaphysical, or ultimate “why” questions.


2. Rational Knowledge (Reason & Intellect)


This comes from thinking, logic, and deduction—independent of direct sensory experience.

  • Central to Rationalism.
  • Uses principles like causality, consistency, and inference.
  • Example: In mathematics, you know a theorem is true through proof, not experiment.

Strengths:
Can reach universal truths (e.g., logic, mathematics); works even without direct observation.


Limitations:
Depends on correct premises; can produce false conclusions if the starting assumptions are flawed.



3. Testimony (Transmitted Reports)


This is knowledge received from others.

  • All literature, including scientific papers come under Testimony.
  • It’s the most critical 
  • Includes history, education, and religious texts.
  • Example: You know about past events (like the World War II) through reliable reports, not direct experience. 
  • Revelation (Wahy) is an important example of testimony as primary source of truth.

Strengths:
Allows access to vast knowledge beyond personal experience; essential for civilization.


Limitations:
Depends on the credibility and authenticity of the source; requires methods of verification (e.g., chains of transmission, peer review).



Why testimony (what we learn from others) is essential:

  • Most of what we “know” isn’t from direct experience—history (like the World War II), science, and even medicine come through trusted reports.
  • Science itself runs on testimony: research papers, expert consensus, and Peer Review are all structured ways of trusting others.
  • No one can verify everything personally—modern knowledge works because of specialization + trust.
  • Even replication doesn’t remove testimony; it just strengthens it through multiple independent confirmations.
  • Civilization depends on testimony:
    • Education = learning from teachers
    • History = transmitted accounts
    • Law = witness testimony


In real life, these sources overlap:


Empiricism (through senses) gives data, reason interprets it—but testimony is what allows knowledge to spread and civilization to exist.

  • A doctor uses empirical data (imaging, labs), reason (clinical judgment), and testimony (medical literature, guidelines).
  • A believer uses revelation for ultimate truths, reason to interpret it, and experience to see its application in the world.

A balanced approach avoids extremes:

  • Pure empiricism ignores meaning and values.
  • Pure rationalism can become detached from reality.
  • Blind reliance on testimony risks uncritical belief.

Other sources of knowledge:


Apart from the above three main sources of knowledge, there are some other sources which are also used by us.


 4. Intuition (Self-evident knowledge)


This is immediate understanding without conscious reasoning.

Example: You instantly know that “the whole is greater than the part” or that a contradiction can’t be true.

In philosophy, this is discussed under Intuitionism.


Why it matters:

It’s the foundation of logic and reasoning itself—you can’t prove everything; some things are just directly known.


 5. Introspection (Inner awareness)


Knowledge of your own mental states.

Example: Knowing “I am in pain” or “I am thinking.”

This is central in Philosophy of Mind.


Why it matters:

It gives certainty about subjective experience—something external observation cannot access.


Wednesday, June 25, 2025

How reliable is "scientific research"


Those who put all their faith in "scientific research" and hence question Islam based on those "research studies" need to wake up from their 'scientism'....

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1182327/#pmed-0020124-b6

"There is increasing concern that in modern research, false findings may be the majority or even the vast majority of published research claims."

The above is also the problem with lots of medical "research".
See this article titled:
'There is a worrying amount of fraud in medical research'
https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2023/02/22/there-is-a-worrying-amount-of-fraud-in-medical-research

"In 2009 PLOS ONE published a round-up of 18 surveys of scientists, mostly in America, that had asked about fraud. Though only 2% of respondents admitted falsifying data themselves, 14% said they knew someone who had. Similarly, a third of those asked confessed to other questionable research practices, such as dropping inconvenient data points based on “gut feeling”, or making important changes to a study’s protocol while it was in progress. But they pointed the finger at 72% of their colleagues."

Also see this article in the reputed journal 'Nature' titled:
Medicine is plagued by untrustworthy clinical trials.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02299-w
"How many studies are faked or flawed?
Investigations suggest that, in some fields, at least one-quarter of clinical trials might be problematic or even entirely made up, warn some researchers.
By studying the IPD spreadsheets, he judged that 44% of these trials contained at least some flawed data: impossible statistics, incorrect calculations or duplicated numbers or figures, for instance. And 26% of the papers had problems that were so widespread that the trial was impossible to trust"